...home health line online
Home Current Issue Print Current Issue Archives Advanced Search Contact Us Register Now

Categories Featured in this Issue
Business -- General
DMERCs
Legislative -- HME
Private Duty
Prospective Payment System - PPS
RHHIs
Regulatory -- HHA
Regulatory -- HME
Trade Associations
Utilization

VIEW ALL SUBJECTS

PRIVACY POLICY

HOME HEALTH INTERACTIVE

COPYRIGHT WARNING:
Copyright violations will be prosecuted. ...home health line shares 50% of the net proceeds of settlements or jury awards with individuals who provide essential evidence of illegal photocopying or electronic redistribution. To report violations contact: Roger Klein Esq., Howrey & Simon, 1299 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C., 20004-2404. Confidential line: 202/383-6846

VIEW ARCHIVED ISSUES FROM:


Issue Date January 7, 2000 Volume XXV, No. 2




Headline Associations to HCFA Fix PPS assumptions, LUPAs, 50/50 split ...and more

If comments on the proposed PPS regulations by five national and six state home health associations are any guide, HCFA won't have trouble identifying where the industry believes plans for home health prospective payments need changing.

Targeted by just about all of the associations are HCFA's tentative budget neutrality formula for setting per-episode rates and its low-utilization payment adjustments (LUPAs) when patients receive four or fewer visits per episode. As for the proposed 50-50 per-episode payment split, nearly all of the 11 associations have urged HCFA to raise the amount it pays at the start of an episode to between 75% and 90% of the total episode payment.

Most of the associations also have asked HCFA to prevent cash-flow interruptions for HHAs when the scheduled transition from cash-based payments to prospective payments occurs virtually overnight on Oct. 1. Opposition to the requirement that physicians affirm each patient's case-mix category, or "home health resource group" (HHRG), also is nearly unanimous.

For Associated Home Health Industries of Florida (AHHIF), in fact, the physician requirement is concern No. 1. "Physicians are already nervous about ordering Medicare home health services due to the heightened publicity from HCFA about its increased fraud and abuse," wrote AHHIF Executive Director Gene Tischer. "This mandate would act as a severe prior restraint on physicians signing plans of treatment and reduce drastically the availability of services to beneficiaries."

Not everything the associations wrote about the PPS proposals was negative. The Visiting Nurse Associations of America, for one, believes that "with a few important adjustments," PPS will enable HHAs to reverse the inefficiencies encouraged by interim payment limits and "once again...reach out to all home health beneficiaries to improve their health and quality of life."

Comments among 350 received

The association opinions were among 350 comment letters HCFA estimates it received to its PPS proposal by last week's December 27th deadline. The volume of comments suggests that at least some modification of the original proposal is needed.

But Bob Wardwell, head of HCFA's PPS task force, continues to offer no clues about how the final PPS regulations his agency has promised to deliver by July might differ from the proposed version. He did, however, tell ...hhl that he and his colleagues are "impressed with the thoughtful analysis and level of detail" in many of the comment letters.

Association comments very detailed

The comments submitted by associations offered detailed analysis on several key points

  • HCFA's budget neutrality adjustment, a critical factor in the total Medicare dollars allotted to fund HHA prospective payments, was item No. 1 in the 26-page comment letter from the National Assn. for Home Care. As mandated by Congress, Medicare's HHA payments under PPS must equal what they would have been under the interim payment system in FY 2001.

    But one "weakness" NAHC sees in HCFA's calculations is the assumption that FY 2001 episodes will be equal to those from FY 1997.

    Since 1997, "all evidence indicates a significant decline in utilization of home health services," making it likely that FY 2001 episodes will be far lower than the 1997 total, wrote NAHC President Val Halamandaris.

    Another shortcoming in HCFA's budget neutrality projections, according to NAHC, is the assumption that HHAs will add visits to episodes of care to avoid the lower LUPA payments. Although HCFA's own database indicates 12% to 15% of all episodes would involve four or fewer visits, HCFA used a behavioral offset in its calculation of rates that had the net effect of only counting 5% of cases under the LUPA, NAHC finds. This proves problematic for the industry because the LUPA underestimation leads to a greater budget neutrality adjustment, which in turn results in lower per-episode payment rates.

    The behavioral assumption is off base, says NAHC, because HHAs are unlikely to hazard the risk when such extra visits could trigger medical reviews. The more likely scenario "Home health agencies will avoid patients who may lead to a LUPA," says NAHC.

  • The Abt Associates determination that 10 therapy visits equal eight hours of therapy services troubles the Texas Assn. for Home Care. Some patients may receive 10 or more visits over fewer than eight hours, while others may receive eight or more hours in fewer than 10 visits, noted Heather Vasek, TAHC director of public policy and regulatory affairs. "Do you have to have both 8+ hours and 10+ visits to be entitled to the therapy case-mix group?," she asks.
  • Per-episode payments below the national episode rate would be more common than at present, the Illinois Home Care Council believes, based on its extrapolations from average provider caseloads and lengths of stay.

    Of the 80 HHRGs, 24 (30%) will produce a payment lower than the national rate, IHCC President Pamela Steinbach noted. Another 40 HHRGs (50%) require a minimum of 10 therapy visits to get reimbursement above the national rate. Yet, based on HCFA estimates that only 15% of Medicare home health patients are likely to qualify for more than the national rate, Steinbach's letter reasoned.

-- B. Schorr

Categories Prospective Payment System - PPS | Regulatory -- HHA | Trade Associations




Headline MedPAC agrees with HCFA plan for no PPS transition, but urges other changes

The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, in comments on the proposed PPS regulations, has endorsed HCFA's plan for a 100% shift to prospective payments on Oct. 1.

Out of concern that PPS could deprive sicker beneficiaries of the home health benefit, some MedPAC members originally wanted a transition to PPS involving a blend of current cost-based payments and prospective payments. But they ultimately agreed with HCFA that by preserving interim payment system inequities, such a blend would do more harm than good.

The influential advisory panel's Dec. 27 letter does urge HCFA to consider basing future PPS payments on a blend of capitated prospective rates and standardized visit rates by discipline.

Such a mixture would reduce PPS incentives for HHAs to "provide a small number of visits above the [LUPA] threshold to generate a payment for the entire episode," the MedPAC letter maintains. At the other end of the episode, it will reduce the incentive to "stint on services," MedPAC believes.

In addition, the commission wants HCFA to consider higher LUPA rates for low-utilization episodes. Because PPS must be budget neutral, such an increase would decrease standard episode payments and thus "reduce the incentive for HHAs to provide five visits to qualify for the total episode," MedPAC suggested.

As indicated by previous statements of commission members, MedPAC also urged HCFA to drop the proposed requirement that physicians must affirm the accuracy of each patient's case-mix adjustment, or home health resource group (HHRG). At MedPAC's Dec. 9 meeting, commission members agreed physicians would have no way to determine the accuracy of how many activities of daily living (ADLs) the patient was able perform -- B. Schorr

Categories Prospective Payment System - PPS | Regulatory -- HHA




Headline Graham-Field mired in investigations, lawsuits

Lawsuits and investigations, several of which are still ongoing, have been a consistent problem facing troubled HME manufacturer/distributor Graham Field, and still could significantly damage the now bankruptcy-protected company.

GF has been plagued by at least one lawsuit throughout 1998 and 1999. In total, the company's Sept. 30, 1999, SEC filing makes mention of four suits filed in 1998, followed by another one in 1999 and ongoing SEC and Florida Grand Jury investigations.

In two of the legal cases, the company has already agreed to settlement amounts. But, GF says it now lacks the funds to pay up on the larger one of them.

The Bay Shore, N.Y.-based home medical equipment manufacturer/distributor said in its SEC filing that it notified the court in October 1999 of its inability to pay the $10 million it had agreed to as part of the settlement of a class action lawsuit back in August 1999.

GF's other settlement was for $87,500 to end allegations of unfair competition and wrongful appropriation of business opportunities in connection with the company's hiring of a certain officer and employees of JOFRA Enterprises, Inc.

Graham-Field and some of its employees are defendants in the following, separate, ongoing disputes

  • Alleged breach of fiduciary duties of loyalty and care with regard to the resignation of Irwin Selinger, the company's former chairman, CEO and president; the company is awaiting the court's decision on its motion to dismiss.
  • Alleged material misrepresentations and omissions in a purchase agreement with LaBac Systems, Inc., a company Graham-Field purchased in May 1999 for $9.1 million in Graham-Field company stock. LaBac former shareholders are seeking $3.2 million in restitution. The case is awaiting arbitration.
  • Alleged misrepresentations in a purchase agreement with Irving Tanning Company, (ITC) which Graham-Field bought as part of another acquisition in June 1999. ITC is seeking $6.75 million in the suit.

SEC & Grand Jury still asking questions

Graham-Field still faces uncertainty related to investigations by both the Securities Exchange Commission and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida.

The SEC launched a formal investigation into accounting errors and irregularities in Graham Field's 1996 and 1997 financial disclosures after a March 1999 audit caused GF to significantly restate earnings. Earnings for both 1996 and 1997, as well as for the first, second and third quarters of 1998 were restated. The SEC has subpoenaed documents related to its investigation.

In Florida, Graham-Field is a target of an ongoing grand jury investigation launched in connection with alleged unauthorized diversion of medical products intended for sale outside the United States into U.S. markets.

Neither investigation has been resolved and the company says it cannot yet assess the potential financial impact.

Graham-Field, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection two days after Christmas, is trying to right itself after a four-year financial slide. GF officials were unable to respond to ...hhl's calls by press time.

For the nine months ended September 30, 1999, it reported revenues of $228.1 million, and a net loss of $41.1 million. -- P. Lott

Categories Regulatory -- HME | Business -- General




Headline Private duty dilemma Job options in booming economy shrink supply of HH aides

The booming U.S. economy means more Americans can afford private duty home care these days. But it also means more and more Americans, from New Jersey to California, can't find agencies able to admit them because the home health aides they need are finding better jobs in other occupations.

There also are growing local shortages of nurses, especially ones that specialize in pediatrics, according to a nationwide survey conducted last fall by the Visting Nurse Assns. of America. One cause lower nursing school admissions.

But of the two problems, the shortage of private duty aides -- whose responsibilities range from homemaker/companions to certified nurses aide -- is far more critical, agency administrators tell ...hhl.

Visiting Nurse Services of the Treasure Coast, the private duty unit of the Visiting Nurse Assn. of Florida, is all too typical of HHAs caught in the unwelcomed employment squeeze. Over the last two months alone, the agency has had to turn down 10 separate requests for 24-hour-a-day care because it lacks the aides to do the necessary home care shifts.

While the VNS of the Treasure Coast's understaffing problem cropped up a year ago, "it's getting worse," says Administrator Bob Quinn.

$8.00 - $8.50 an hour isn't enough

In line with the 30 or so other HHAs in its area, Visiting Nurse Services of the Treasure Coast currently is paying its private duty aides $8.00 - $8.50 an hour. The problem is "they're also getting that in the malls," along with health and other benefits his agency can't afford, Quinn reports. Moreover, compared with helping infirm patients to bathe, dress and use the toilet, those retail jobs "are less intense work," he notes.

Short of an economic slowdown, relief from the current shortage of home health aides isn't in sight, predicts Peter Buerhaus, director of Harvard's Nursing Research Institute. Because those who might have worked as home health aides now have other job options, "economics have tightened up for home health agencies," Buerhaus says.

While the Harvard Nursing Research Institute lacks figures for 1999, Buerhaus is hearing "consistent reports" of aide shortages in Colorado, Texas and elsewhere. The shortages are in spite of the fact that the real earnings of home health aides rose in 1998 for the first time in the seven years Buerhaus has been monitoring them, he says.

Traditional recruiting methods not working

One sign of a worsening problem Aide recruitment techniques no longer work the way they once did.

That's certainly been the experience of Caregivers of Southwestern Pennsylvania, located in Greensburg, 30 miles east of Pittsburgh.

The private duty agency once could count on recruiting graduates of a three-month home aide course given by a local community college.

Last year, though, when the college course wasn't able to attract students and was, therefore, not offered, the agency decided to invest in its own 80-hour course. The agency's bill came to $960 for each of the eight job candidates -- who included single welfare mothers and middle-aged widows -- who agreed to take the course in return for a commitment to provide 200 hours of (paid) aide work.

Net result "As soon as they completed the 200 hours, they were all gone," says Mary Jane Helfrich, Caregivers of Southwestern Pennsylvania's chief financial officer. Helfrich has managed to maintain a force of about 30 "casual employment" aides who work eight to 40 or more hours a week at a rate of $7.50 an hour, plus any overtime. But she could use six more.

"We can't grow our business because we can't hire the people to do it," she complains.

More money? It's not that simple

Paying aides more money undoubtedly would make HHAs more competitive in the tight job market. But agency managers contacted by ...hhl fear raising prices to cover their increased labor costs.

"Unfortunately, the more we increase our costs, the more consumers will be forced to find services elsewhere," says Judith Clinco, president of Catalina In-Home Services, Tucson, Ariz. It could even become the case that private duty customers begin to directly hire their own full-time in-home helpers to avoid high agency costs, she notes.

Clinco's certified nurse aides get $8.25 an hour, plus 75 cents more per hour for night and weekend duty. Their comparatively generous benefits package also includes a 50% company contribution to health insurance and one week of paid vacation after one year of service. But with

local supermarket cashiers earning $10 an hour and fast food managers, $30,000 a year, Clinco remains 25 aides shy of the 100 or so she actually needs, she says. -- B. Schorr

Categories Private Duty




Headline Tight job market calls for imaginative recruitment methods

When the going gets tough, it's time for HHAs to get creative.

HHAs hard pressed to recruit home health aides in the current tight job market can't escape the fact that low unemployment invariably means high turnover of such workers, says Bob Fazzi, president of Fazzi & Associates, Northampton, Mass.

Even so, there are recruitment strategies that work. Fazzi's advice to HHAs Look at your current worker population for clues about what neighborhoods are the best recruiting grounds. Then talk to priests, ministers and rabbis there for leads on possible job applicants, or place ads in papers serving those neighborhoods.

Jack Pfeffer, president of Lifeline Home Health Services, Dallas, has stopped placing nurse and aide recruitment ads in the Dallas Morning News and making job fair pitches after finding them unproductive. Instead, he places his recruitment in ads in various local newspapers.

Pfeffer's biggest success, however, has retaining those whom he hires. The privately held company has created an attractive employee stock distribution plan for those who work more than 1,000 hours annually. The agency will repurchase the privately held stock at updated prices, provided the employee has remains on the payroll at least five years.

The stock plan and other staff retention policies have held departures among the HHA's 260 or so staffers at "half or less" of the industry norm, Pfeffer reports.

Lining up government-funded training programs also can help, believes Joseph Campanella, executive director of the Home Care Council of New York City, which represents 60 organizations providing home care for about 65,000 mostly Medicaid patients annually.

In 1999, he used a $300,000 federal-state worker retraining grant to provide 30 hours of basic classroom instruction, plus six additional hours in dementia care training to approximately 500 home care workers, most of whom were new recruits. The certificates the workers received made them "feel good" about their jobs, Camapanella says. -- B. Schorr

Categories Business -- General




Headline Still fewer home health jobs than in ’97, but rebounding

The home health labor market appears to have turned the corner. According to new Department of Labor figures, the industry has recovered much of the ground it lost as a result of IPS-related job cuts

As of Nov. 30, 1999, the preliminary count of home health workers stood at 663,300 -- only about 5% fewer than in January 1998, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The November total -- which includes home health nurses, therapists and aides -- also represented a 1% increase from November 1998.

HCFA's latest "Health Care Indicators" report notes that for the second quarter of 1998 (the latest statistics it references) home health employment dropped 3.3%, which was less severe than for the previous four quarters. The change suggests that the brunt of the industry's reaction to the interim payment limits imposed by the 1997 Balanced Budget Act "is attenuating," the report says.

Separately, the Labor Dept. projects that registered nurses and personal care/home health aides are among the 10 occupations expected to show the largest job growth in the 1998-2008 period.

The number of working RNs will increase 22% over the 10-year period, to 2.53 million, and the number of aides will increase 58%, to 1.18 million, Labor predicts.

In developing both figures, Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics took into account the shrinkage in Medicare home health under the 1997 Balanced Budget Act, a bureau statistician says. Also, roughly two in five of the personal care/home health aides in Labor's forecast are "residential" aides, who work directly for individual patients rather than for HHAs. -- B. Schorr

Categories Business -- General




Headline Part B billing allows VNA to offer primary care services

Imagine if your HHA could provide more patient care without coming close to hitting your IPS cost limits. Imagine not having to worry about the interim payment system limits, or OASIS. Imagine a reimbursement system where you were paid based on the complexity of the case, and amount of time and skill it required.

Sound too good to be true? It's reality for the Visiting Nurse Assn. of Philadelphia, which began billing Medicare Part B for physician services in the home a year ago February.

Stephen Holt, CEO of the VNA of Philadelphia said he first got the idea for starting a separate company called VNA House Calls last year when he and his staff tried to brainstorm IPS fixes.

"There seemed to be so little we could do because home care is so dependent on everybody else. We can't diagnose patients ourselves. We can't develop our own plans of care. We can't even determine what medications are necessary. Then I started thinking, why not? Why can't home care have a part in primary care?" says Holt.

Having physicians and nurse practitioners deliver care in the home allows the VNA to meet a dire need of patients. "Here we are in the middle of a city with some of the best teaching hospitals and physician practices in the country and our homebound patients can't get a physical or have their flu treated," explains Holt.

Once the VNA began offering primary care at home, another big benefit emerged. House Calls bills for its physician and nurse practitioner services under the home care visit codes in Medicare Part B. That means the Medicare Part A home health Conditions of Participation, including the OASIS rule, do not apply to House Calls.

It also means reimbursement as high as $154.51 per physician or nurse practitioner home care visit in the Philadelphia region. That's 11% more than received in 1999. And that reimbursement is only for the visit itself, notes Holt.

If physicians or nurse practitioners perform other services -- such as administering shots or minor in-home procedures such as removing moles etc. -- House Calls bills Part B for those services under separate codes. (There are 7,000 Part B physician service codes.)

Not only that, but, House Calls' visits do not count toward the VNA's IPS per-visit limits, because they are billed under Part B.

The VNA has separately incorporated its House Calls program, in which three nurse practitioners and one physician serve 250 patients, says COO and program manager Lynn Rinke. But don't suggest that House Calls isn't home care. "The point is that this is what home care once was, could be and should be. It's just not what everyone thinks of as home care, " says Holt.

He's right, says a HCFA spokesperson. Any corporation -- home care-affiliated companies included -- can apply for a Part B provider number and, if accepted, bill an intermediary for those services.

Not that it was an easy process. It took several tries before Camp Hill, Pa.-based Xact Medical Services, the Part B fiscal intermediary for the Philadelphia area, even took the VNA's calls. "We kept getting, ‘Home health? You're calling the wrong place'" says Holt.

Six months later, the VNA had a provider number and each physician and nurse practitioner had an identification number, says Rinke. "It wasn't really a complicated process, just a long one," she says. The hardest part convincing HCFA, intermediaries, and even fellow HHA administrators, that home health could bill for this service.

Other benefits for House Calls

  • Better treatment consistency. "We're doing exactly what HCFA's always wanted getting physicians involved in home care," says Holt. The plans of care make more sense, action is taken more quickly when there are problems, and we see a better improvement rate when the patient has contact with their primary care physician during home health treatment.
  • Improved public relations with customers. House Calls marketed itself, says Rinke. "Now we're known as the house calls place," she says. "It makes our service package more complete. In essence, it allows us to treat not just the patient who has a particular incident that requires care, but to care for that patient in his or her home completely, meeting all their needs," she says.

Getting doctors on board

Not everyone is a fan of the program, however.

Tim Cousanis, VP for Jefferson Home Care, Ardmore, Penn., an affiliate of Hallmark Health System, says a primary care service would never work for his agency because it's hospital-based. "We'd be co-opting our own services," he says.That has been an issue Rinke admits House Calls has had to overcome. "We try to be very doctor-friendly," she says, adding "we're very sensitive to the reaction of our patients' existing primary care physicians." -- J. Apter

Editor's note Year 2000 home care visit and care plan oversight rates for all geographic areas are listed in ...hhl's Care Plan Oversight Handbook [H661HHL] Call 1-888-293-9383 to order.

Categories Business -- General | Regulatory -- HHA




Headline Home care market notes

  • Common stock of Integrated Health Services is still being traded despite the company's de-listing by the New York Stock Exchange on Dec. 17 for having total stockholders' equity less than $50 million and a 30-day average share price of less than $1.00. On January 5, stock of the Sparks, Md.-based parent company of RoTech and nursing home giant began trading on the National Association of Securities Dealers' OTC Bulletin Board Service under the new stock symbol IHSV. Stockholders will have access to stock quotes and trades through any brokerage or on-line service. Visit www.otcbb.com for more information on the OTC bulletin board service and stock quotes.
  • Shares of Infu-Tech, Inc. leaped nearly 42% Jan. 4, 2000, closing up 13/16 to $2.75 per share after the Carlstadt, N.J.-based home IV company claimed its upcoming SmartMeds.com website could be a medical error reduction tool. Infu-Tech plans to launch the site in early October.
  • Integrated Health Services, Inc. (IHS) opted not to make a $4.1 million interest payment due January 3 on $143.8 million in convertible senior subordinated notes due 2001. The Sparks, Md.-based company now has a 30-day grace period to make the payment before it will be considered to have defaulted on the notes which were issued at a 5.75% interest rate. It is currently in discussions with its lenders for restructuring of its debt. -- P. Lott

    Categories Business -- General




    Headline Tips from Thomas-Payne Expert answers 5 common HME questions

    Can you bill a beneficiary for related supplies not usually covered by Medicare when Medicare pays for the oxygen concentrator rental? Are you responsible for ensuring that customers will have the DME they need when they travel out town?

    Suppliers pose these questions every day to reimbursement expert Lisa Thomas-Payne, president, Medical Reimbursement Systems, Albuquerque, N.M.

    Beginning with this week's issue, ...hhl will publish a selection of her answers in a monthly feature called "Tips from Thomas-Payne." Here's the first batch

    • If Medicare pays for an oxygen concentrator rental, can I bill the patient for supplies that Medicare does not cover? Yes, as long as the supplies are not included in Medicare's rental allowable, such as sterile water for oxygen cannulas, answers Thomas-Payne. Make sure the patient or someone authorized by the patient verifies delivery of the items by signing a delivery ticket.
    • When patients travel, is it my responsibility to arrange for another DME company to provide them with DME while they're away? No. If your equipment is not going with the patient when they travel, you are not required to help the patient find an oxygen supplier while on his or her trip, says Thomas-Payne.

      Once a patient leaves your service area without your equipment, the patient can obtain services from another supplier and handle reimbursement directly with the other supplier. The only time this can get complicated is when the patient leaves your service in the middle of a rental month, Thomas-Payne warns. Because you are paid for a full month, you may have some responsibility to provide service (i.e. extra oxygen cannulas) until the end of the rental month [...hhl 6/28/99].

    • Must my company offer delivery of all HME to all beneficiaries? Not exactly. The supplier standards state that suppliers must be responsible for delivery of Medicare covered items to beneficiaries. The standards don't state that suppliers must personally deliver the items, Thomas-Payne points out.

      Suppliers are thus responsible for ensuring that products arrive by whatever means necessary; this includes patient pick-up, using a package delivery service, or mailing the item via the U.S. mail.

    • If I sell an item in a cash sale for less than the Medicare allowable, do I have to document the discount? Yes. Charge the customer the same price that you would charge Medicare, and then document any cash-sale discounts as a credit amount against the normal charge, Thomas-Payne suggests. This will ensure that a zealous auditor doesn't misinterpret the cash discount.
    • Can I bill the patient when Medicaid denies a claim because the patient has other "primary" insurance? No. When Medicaid is the secondary payer and Medicaid denies payment because the primary payer exceeded Medicaid's allowed charge, you can not bill the patient, says Thomas-Payne. Medicaid considers itself the payer of last resort -- not the patient.
    -- W. Johnson

    Categories Regulatory -- HME | Legislative -- HME | DMERCs




    Headline Avoid denied claims Tips to overcome top 5 reasons

    Here's a way to avoid having claims denied because services weren't documented -- one of the five top denial reasons reported by the country's second largest RHHI. Simply check whether your photocopy machine -- or the operator -- has skipped a visit note.

    That's what Olsten Corp.'s Home Health Services unit advises its approximately 200 HHAs. Their experience shows visit notes skipped while being photocopied as the single biggest cause of submitting claims without all the paperwork, says Diana Moran, an Olsten clinical reimbursement specialist.

    "If you have 10 visits, the only remedy is to make certain you have 10 notes," she observes.

    ...hhl asked Moran and Debbie Crawford, assistant director of Waterloo (Iowa) VNA, for suggestions about how to avoid five frequent denial reasons identified by Wellmark Inc., which will be replaced as primary RHHI for 15 states and the national alternative RHHI by June 2000. Its contract is being picked up by Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Alabama [...hhl 12/17/99].

    In addition to having Wellmark as their common intermediary, Moran and Crawford work for organizations identified by trade associations as effective in avoiding denials.

    As of March 31, 1999, the five reasons Wellmark identified accounted for 15% of all home health denials. ("Services not documented," the third most frequent denial cause, represented 3% of the denials.). Here are Wellmark's four other leading denial causes, in order of frequency, and suggestions for dealing with them

    • "Skilled observation -- initial approval/ now stable" -- This refers to cases, such as patients with chronic hypertension, where the patient is judge medically stable and therefore regular observation no longer is medically justified, even though Medicare may have paid for it previously.

      Waterloo VNA assigns care coordinators to its two geographic teams (each with eight to 10 nurses) who backstop nurses' own assessments. The coordinators review all Medicare cases to double check that patients are medically unstable and homebound, says Assistant Director Crawford.

      Olsten recognizes that with elderly, isolated patients, stability decisions almost require a crystal ball, says clinical reimbursement expert Moran. "We tell nurses to use their best judgment."

      But Olsten frequently reminds nurses to document services that are the basis for those judgments, such as instruction on medication and the result, that they often fail to get down on paper, Moran says.

    • "No physician orders were obtained for the services billed" -- Spurred by the increased number of "additional data requests" (ADRs) Waterloo has been receiving from Wellmark, Crawford and her agency's care coordinator personally check every bill for a written order from the patient's doctor.

      Olsten expects its computer system to flag bills lacking orders, but it also conducts pre-submission manual reviews to make sure the order is documented.

    • "Homebound -- documentation does not support homebound status" -- This is the toughest denial reason to forestall.

      One thing that can be done Education physicians not to refer patients who aren't really homebound. Olsten does this through its marketing representatives. They try for one-on-one meetings with practitioners to present written guidelines on when a patient meets HCFA's homebound standards. Olsten also encourages practitioner to let it help them decide if a patient is truly homebound, Moran says.

      Waterloo VNA, for its part, recognizes that the homebound decision is a "professional judgment" that could be challenged. But it also has become "a little more conservative," Crawford says. If there's any likelihood of homebound status being denied, it won't accept the patient for Medicare, though it might make non-Medicare arrangements, she adds.

    • "Procedures -- non-skilled" -- This often involves dressing changes for a part of the body the patient can't reach, such as toe or neck, Olsten finds. Wellmark may insist the patient or family member, rather than the nurse, should care for a wound. Olsten nurses have little choice but to tell the patient they can't do it, Moran says.

      Waterloo VNA often finds in such cases that its only option is to offer the patient private care.

    -- B. Schorr

    Categories Utilization | RHHIs




    Headline HCFA wants comments on its advance beneficiary notice

    What kind of Advance Beneficiary notice do you believe Medicare beneficiaries are entitled prior to furnishing of services or termination/reduction of services you believe Medicare won't pay for? It's a question HCFA finally posed to the industry in a Federal Register notice January 3rd.

    The request -- published in the Jan. 3 Federal Register -- follows a protest by the National Assn. for Home Care that HCFA's original advance beneficiary (ABN) notice directive of last September violated the Paperwork law by failing to allow a public comment period.

    Although HCFA's Federal Register notice doesn't say so directly, the ABN requirements for which it's seeking comments are the somewhat revised version disseminated by the regional home health intermediaries last month [...hhl 12/17/99], a HCFA spokesperson says.

    Send comment to

    Health Care Financing Admin.,
    Office of Information Services/Security & Standards Group
    Div. of HCFA Enterprise Standards
    Attn Dawn Willinghan, Room N2-14-26
    7500 Security Blvd.
    Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
    -- B. Schorr

    Categories Regulatory -- HHA